[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130626144903.GA2210@asylum.americas.sgi.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 09:49:04 -0500
From: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>
To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Cc: Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com>, holt@....com, travis@....com,
rob@...dley.net, tglx@...utronix.de, mingo@...hat.com,
hpa@...or.com, yinghai@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, x86@...nel.org,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/2] x86_64, mm: Reinsert the absent memory
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 02:14:30PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
>
> * Nathan Zimmer <nzimmer@....com> wrote:
>
> > perf seems to struggle with 512 cpus, but I did get some data.
>
> Btw., mind outlining in what way it struggles?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ingo
System interactivity take a nose dive, including the ability to halt perf.
The commands do get through but they take a while.
Other processes tend to make signifigantly reduced progress.
Also it tends to slow down all running processes.
My guess it is the NMIs overwhelming the system but I have not found a good way
to profile perf gone wild so it is only a guess.
The issue mitigate somewhat by restrictring the number of cpus perf is
recording or by not using the -g option, but sometimes I do need data on the
whole system.
Nate
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists