[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130626211052.GN20274@pd.tnic>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 23:10:52 +0200
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Update MCE severity condition check
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:00:10PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > And this obviously is the case for the hardware too, I assume, not only
> > the SDM?
>
> Yes - we have a magic process which reconfigures all deployed silicon whenever
> a new SDM is published :-)
Haha, I wouldn't wonder if your silicon dudes come up with
reprogrammable fuses someday :-)
> Actually the SDM had been collecting new features for each generation ... each
> time just bolting on a new paragraph or table. I snapped when I saw the table
> that was proposed for 15-20 to add "continuable" errors and complained that
> it had gotten way too complicated ... and proposed the version that you see in
> the current SDM.
>
> It accurately portrays what older generations implemented, and adds the new
> continuable (EIPV=1, RIPV=1) while removing many rows and columns.
Cool :)
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
Sent from a fat crate under my desk. Formatting is fine.
--
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists