[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130627064205.GA23923@gchen.bj.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 02:42:05 -0400
From: Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Update MCE severity condition check
On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 11:10:52PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 23:10:52 +0200
> From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
> To: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
> Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Chen
> Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>, "Naveen N. Rao"
> <naveen.n.rao@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/mce: Update MCE severity condition check
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
>
> On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 09:00:10PM +0000, Luck, Tony wrote:
> > > And this obviously is the case for the hardware too, I assume, not only
> > > the SDM?
> >
> > Yes - we have a magic process which reconfigures all deployed silicon whenever
> > a new SDM is published :-)
>
> Haha, I wouldn't wonder if your silicon dudes come up with
> reprogrammable fuses someday :-)
If so, it must be a catastrophe and the guys who wrote SDM have a big
trouble ... ;-)
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists