[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <9028702.KGsxCx1772@wuerfel>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 10:43:01 +0200
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: arm64: include: asm: add pci.h to pass compiling
On Thursday 27 June 2013 08:30:40 Chen Gang wrote:
> On 06/26/2013 10:07 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 04:26:41AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
> > I wonder whether it makes sense to include pci-dma-compat.h in
> > asm-generic/pci.h, I don't see why one would want the generic pci.h but
> > not the generic pci-dma-compat.h (cc'ing Arnd).
>
> I think, it will let architecture guys easier to add their own
> pci-dma-compat.h (although they still need generic pci_dma_compat.h, and
> generic pci.h, too).
>
> e.g. one architecture want include generic pci-dma-compat.h firstly,
> then define its own features in its own pci-dma-compat.h.
I think there is no excuse for still keeping the asm-generic/pci-dma-compat.h
header around any more.
All architectures use the same implementation and have done so for years.
We should just convert the remaining users to use the dma_mapping.h
interfaces directly.
Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists