[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51CC11F7.2060306@asianux.com>
Date: Thu, 27 Jun 2013 18:20:39 +0800
From: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
To: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
CC: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: arm64: include: asm: add pci.h to pass compiling
On 06/27/2013 04:43 PM, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> On Thursday 27 June 2013 08:30:40 Chen Gang wrote:
>> > On 06/26/2013 10:07 PM, Catalin Marinas wrote:
>>> > > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 04:26:41AM +0100, Chen Gang wrote:
>>> > > I wonder whether it makes sense to include pci-dma-compat.h in
>>> > > asm-generic/pci.h, I don't see why one would want the generic pci.h but
>>> > > not the generic pci-dma-compat.h (cc'ing Arnd).
>> >
>> > I think, it will let architecture guys easier to add their own
>> > pci-dma-compat.h (although they still need generic pci_dma_compat.h, and
>> > generic pci.h, too).
>> >
>> > e.g. one architecture want include generic pci-dma-compat.h firstly,
>> > then define its own features in its own pci-dma-compat.h.
> I think there is no excuse for still keeping the asm-generic/pci-dma-compat.h
> header around any more.
>
> All architectures use the same implementation and have done so for years.
> We should just convert the remaining users to use the dma_mapping.h
> interfaces directly.
in "asm-generic/pci-dma-compat.h", it include "linux/dma-mapping.h" firstly.
So can we say it also has additional features (at least for compatible
old things) which "dma-mapping.h" not have ?
Thanks.
--
Chen Gang
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists