[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130627195536.29830.580.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 01:25:37 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, tj@...nel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
walken@...gle.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, David.Laight@...lab.com
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, sbw@....edu, fweisbec@...il.com,
zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 17/45] tick-broadcast: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic() to
prevent CPU offline
Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able
to depend on disabling preemption to prevent CPUs from going offline
from under us.
Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going
offline, while invoking from atomic context.
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c | 8 ++++++++
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
index 9d96a54..1e4ac45 100644
--- a/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
+++ b/kernel/time/tick-broadcast.c
@@ -227,12 +227,14 @@ static void tick_do_broadcast(struct cpumask *mask)
*/
static void tick_do_periodic_broadcast(void)
{
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
raw_spin_lock(&tick_broadcast_lock);
cpumask_and(tmpmask, cpu_online_mask, tick_broadcast_mask);
tick_do_broadcast(tmpmask);
raw_spin_unlock(&tick_broadcast_lock);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
}
/*
@@ -335,11 +337,13 @@ out:
*/
void tick_broadcast_on_off(unsigned long reason, int *oncpu)
{
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
if (!cpumask_test_cpu(*oncpu, cpu_online_mask))
printk(KERN_ERR "tick-broadcast: ignoring broadcast for "
"offline CPU #%d\n", *oncpu);
else
tick_do_broadcast_on_off(&reason);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
}
/*
@@ -505,6 +509,7 @@ static void tick_handle_oneshot_broadcast(struct clock_event_device *dev)
ktime_t now, next_event;
int cpu, next_cpu = 0;
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
raw_spin_lock(&tick_broadcast_lock);
again:
dev->next_event.tv64 = KTIME_MAX;
@@ -562,6 +567,7 @@ again:
goto again;
}
raw_spin_unlock(&tick_broadcast_lock);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
}
/*
@@ -756,6 +762,7 @@ void tick_broadcast_switch_to_oneshot(void)
struct clock_event_device *bc;
unsigned long flags;
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&tick_broadcast_lock, flags);
tick_broadcast_device.mode = TICKDEV_MODE_ONESHOT;
@@ -764,6 +771,7 @@ void tick_broadcast_switch_to_oneshot(void)
tick_broadcast_setup_oneshot(bc);
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&tick_broadcast_lock, flags);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
}
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists