[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130627195554.29830.38682.stgit@srivatsabhat.in.ibm.com>
Date: Fri, 28 Jun 2013 01:25:55 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, tj@...nel.org,
oleg@...hat.com, paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, rusty@...tcorp.com.au,
mingo@...nel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, namhyung@...nel.org,
walken@...gle.com, vincent.guittot@...aro.org,
laijs@...fujitsu.com, David.Laight@...lab.com
Cc: rostedt@...dmis.org, wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
xiaoguangrong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, sbw@....edu, fweisbec@...il.com,
zhong@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, nikunj@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [PATCH v3 18/45] time/clocksource: Use get/put_online_cpus_atomic()
to prevent CPU offline
Once stop_machine() is gone from the CPU offline path, we won't be able
to depend on disabling preemption to prevent CPUs from going offline
from under us.
Use the get/put_online_cpus_atomic() APIs to prevent CPUs from going
offline, while invoking from atomic context.
Cc: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Srivatsa S. Bhat <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
kernel/time/clocksource.c | 5 +++++
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+)
diff --git a/kernel/time/clocksource.c b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
index e713ef7..c4bbc25 100644
--- a/kernel/time/clocksource.c
+++ b/kernel/time/clocksource.c
@@ -30,6 +30,7 @@
#include <linux/sched.h> /* for spin_unlock_irq() using preempt_count() m68k */
#include <linux/tick.h>
#include <linux/kthread.h>
+#include <linux/cpu.h>
#include "tick-internal.h"
@@ -252,6 +253,7 @@ static void clocksource_watchdog(unsigned long data)
int64_t wd_nsec, cs_nsec;
int next_cpu, reset_pending;
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
spin_lock(&watchdog_lock);
if (!watchdog_running)
goto out;
@@ -329,6 +331,7 @@ static void clocksource_watchdog(unsigned long data)
add_timer_on(&watchdog_timer, next_cpu);
out:
spin_unlock(&watchdog_lock);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
}
static inline void clocksource_start_watchdog(void)
@@ -367,6 +370,7 @@ static void clocksource_enqueue_watchdog(struct clocksource *cs)
{
unsigned long flags;
+ get_online_cpus_atomic();
spin_lock_irqsave(&watchdog_lock, flags);
if (cs->flags & CLOCK_SOURCE_MUST_VERIFY) {
/* cs is a clocksource to be watched. */
@@ -386,6 +390,7 @@ static void clocksource_enqueue_watchdog(struct clocksource *cs)
/* Check if the watchdog timer needs to be started. */
clocksource_start_watchdog();
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&watchdog_lock, flags);
+ put_online_cpus_atomic();
}
static void clocksource_dequeue_watchdog(struct clocksource *cs)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists