linux-kernel - regulator: Is there any reason the 88PM800 regulator driver can not be built as module?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1372426585.28529.5.camel@phoenix>
Date:	Fri, 28 Jun 2013 21:36:25 +0800
From:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
To:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc:	Yi Zhang <yizhang@...vell.com>, Chao Xie <chao.xie@...vell.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: regulator: Is there any reason the 88PM800 regulator driver can not
 be built as module?

Hi,
I ask this because MFD_88PM800 can be built as module.
So any reason REGULATOR_88PM800 must be bool?

Regards,
Axel

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/