linux-kernel - Re: regulator: Is there any reason the 88PM800 regulator driver can not be built as module?

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130628135051.GK27646@sirena.org.uk>
Date:	Fri, 28 Jun 2013 14:50:51 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
Cc:	Yi Zhang <yizhang@...vell.com>, Chao Xie <chao.xie@...vell.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: regulator: Is there any reason the 88PM800 regulator driver can
 not be built as module?

On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 09:36:25PM +0800, Axel Lin wrote:

> I ask this because MFD_88PM800 can be built as module.
> So any reason REGULATOR_88PM800 must be bool?

No, it should be module capable.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)