| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAErSpo7oeYUWS+jaJqm-4i+tN0HuOZrrxZt7GDmeRSmj4pzYYQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 15:31:01 -0600 From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> To: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>, Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>, "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for hot-add root bus On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote: > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote: >> the reason why we need to change those codes for x86, we want to make it support >> pci root bus hotplug. So it would be reasonable for us to align other >> platform to x86 >> changes after pci root bus hotplug change is completely done. > > OK, I opened https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52531 as a > way to keep track of this consistency issue ... What's your plan for this? We desperately need more cross-arch consistency in how we manage resources, and I'd like to make some progress in this cycle. Bjorn -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists