[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAE9FiQWkecbt_+W1OGZNWk7MMaQZcNS-J2PkDvx6dxjaNKC32A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 2 Jul 2013 15:55:24 -0700
From: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>
To: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>, Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Taku Izumi <izumi.taku@...fujitsu.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/8] PCI, ACPI, x86: Reserve fw allocated resource for
hot-add root bus
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 2:31 PM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 11:39 AM, Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com> wrote:
>> On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 10:53 AM, Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org> wrote:
>
>>> the reason why we need to change those codes for x86, we want to make it support
>>> pci root bus hotplug. So it would be reasonable for us to align other
>>> platform to x86
>>> changes after pci root bus hotplug change is completely done.
>>
>> OK, I opened https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=52531 as a
>> way to keep track of this consistency issue ...
>
> What's your plan for this? We desperately need more cross-arch
> consistency in how we manage resources, and I'd like to make some
> progress in this cycle.
Ok, will work on that.
but will on top of
[PATCH v5 0/7] PCI: Change assign unassigned resources per root bus bassis
and attached.
will resend them after v3.11-rc1 is out.
Thanks
Yinghai
Download attachment "root_bus_ioport_skip_2_a.patch" of type "application/octet-stream" (1298 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists