linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/13] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA balancing V2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130703161915.GJ1875@suse.de>
Date:	Wed, 3 Jul 2013 17:19:15 +0100
From:	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
	Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/13] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA
 balancing V2

On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 03:21:27PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> o 3.9.0-vanilla		vanilla kernel with automatic numa balancing enabled
> o 3.9.0-morefaults	Patches 1-9
> o 3.9.0-scalescan	Patches 1-10
> o 3.9.0-scanshared	Patches 1-12
> o 3.9.0-accountpreferred Patches 1-13
> 

I screwed up the testing as 3.9.0-morefaults is not patches 1-9 at all and
I only noticed when examining an anomaly. It's a unreleased series that
I screwed up the patch generation for. The conclusions about patches 1-9
are invalid. I'll redo the testing.

-- 
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/