[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130703162607.GA27908@suse.de>
Date: Wed, 3 Jul 2013 17:26:07 +0100
From: Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/13] Basic scheduler support for automatic NUMA
balancing V2
On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 05:19:15PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 03, 2013 at 03:21:27PM +0100, Mel Gorman wrote:
> > o 3.9.0-vanilla vanilla kernel with automatic numa balancing enabled
> > o 3.9.0-morefaults Patches 1-9
> > o 3.9.0-scalescan Patches 1-10
> > o 3.9.0-scanshared Patches 1-12
> > o 3.9.0-accountpreferred Patches 1-13
> >
>
> I screwed up the testing as 3.9.0-morefaults is not patches 1-9 at all and
> I only noticed when examining an anomaly. It's a unreleased series that
> I screwed up the patch generation for. The conclusions about patches 1-9
> are invalid. I'll redo the testing.
>
Wow..... I'm a double idiot. 3.9.0-morefaults really is patches 1-9 that
was released. The conclusions are ok. I was looking at the unreleased v3
of the series just there and the anomaly is in there. Long day, giving
up before I manage to stick my foot in it for a third time.
--
Mel Gorman
SUSE Labs
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists