[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4D68720C2E767A4AA6A8796D42C8EB59CCF152@BGSMSX101.gar.corp.intel.com>
Date: Thu, 4 Jul 2013 17:19:04 +0000
From: "R, Durgadoss" <durgadoss.r@...el.com>
To: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
"Zhang, Rui" <rui.zhang@...el.com>,
Eduardo Valentin <eduardo.valentin@...com>
CC: "cpufreq@...r.kernel.org" <cpufreq@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux PM list <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonghwa Lee <jonghwa3.lee@...sung.com>,
"l.majewski@...ess.pl" <l.majewski@...ess.pl>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@...aro.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v5 5/7] thermal:boost: Automatic enable/disable of BOOST
feature
Hi Lukasz,
> -----Original Message-----
> From: linux-pm-owner@...r.kernel.org [mailto:linux-pm-
> owner@...r.kernel.org] On Behalf Of Lukasz Majewski
> Sent: Thursday, July 04, 2013 2:20 PM
> To: Viresh Kumar; Rafael J. Wysocki; Zhang, Rui; Eduardo Valentin
> Cc: cpufreq@...r.kernel.org; Linux PM list; Jonghwa Lee; Lukasz Majewski;
> l.majewski@...ess.pl; linux-kernel; Andre Przywara; Daniel Lezcano; Kukjin Kim;
> Myungjoo Ham
> Subject: [PATCH v5 5/7] thermal:boost: Automatic enable/disable of BOOST
> feature
>
> This patch provides auto disable/enable operation for boost. When any
> defined trip point is passed, the boost is disabled.
> In that moment thermal monitor workqueue is woken up and it monitors
> if the device temperature drops below 75% of the smallest trip point.
> When device cools down, the boost is enabled again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Lukasz Majewski <l.majewski@...sung.com>
> Signed-off-by: Myungjoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>
>
> ---
> Changes for v5:
> - Move boost disable code from cpu_cooling.c to thermal_core.c
> (to handle_non_critical_trips)
> - Extent struct thermal_zone_device by adding overheated bool flag
> - Implement auto enable of boost after device cools down
> - Introduce boost_polling flag, which indicates if thermal uses it's predefined
> pool delay or has woken up thermal workqueue only to wait until device
> cools down.
>
> Changes for v4:
> - New patch
>
> drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> include/linux/thermal.h | 2 ++
> 2 files changed, 33 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> index d755440..12adbad 100644
> --- a/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> +++ b/drivers/thermal/thermal_core.c
> @@ -33,6 +33,7 @@
> #include <linux/idr.h>
> #include <linux/thermal.h>
> #include <linux/reboot.h>
> +#include <linux/cpufreq.h>
> #include <net/netlink.h>
> #include <net/genetlink.h>
>
> @@ -326,6 +327,15 @@ static void monitor_thermal_zone(struct
> thermal_zone_device *tz)
> static void handle_non_critical_trips(struct thermal_zone_device *tz,
> int trip, enum thermal_trip_type trip_type)
> {
> + if (cpufreq_boost_supported()) {
> + tz->overheated = true;
> + cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(0);
> + if (!tz->polling_delay) {
> + tz->boost_polling = true;
> + tz->polling_delay = 1000;
> + }
> + }
> +
> if (tz->governor)
> tz->governor->throttle(tz, trip);
> }
> @@ -453,6 +463,27 @@ static void thermal_zone_device_check(struct
> work_struct *work)
> struct thermal_zone_device *tz = container_of(work, struct
> thermal_zone_device,
> poll_queue.work);
> + long trip_temp;
> +
> + if (cpufreq_boost_supported() && tz->overheated) {
Not all thermal drivers support trip points. So, we first need a
if (tz->ops->get_trip_temp) check here.
> + tz->ops->get_trip_temp(tz, 0, &trip_temp);
> + /*
> + * Enable boost again only when current temperature is less
> + * than 75% of trip_temp[0]
> + */
> + if ((tz->temperature + (trip_temp >> 2)) < trip_temp) {
Another way would be to use the get_trend APIs for this thermal zone.
If the trend is cooling we can re-enable boost otherwise not.
> + tz->overheated = false;
> + if (tz->boost_polling) {
> + tz->boost_polling = false;
> + tz->polling_delay = 0;
> + monitor_thermal_zone(tz);
> + }
Overall, I believe this will work well only if the thermal zone is CPU.
Another suggestion is: We tried hard to remove all throttling logic from
thermal_core.c. May be we should include this kind of logic in
step_wise.c ? Rui/Eduardo: Any thoughts on this ?
Thanks,
Durga
> +
> + cpufreq_boost_trigger_state(1);
> + return;
> + }
> + }
> +
> thermal_zone_device_update(tz);
> }
>
> diff --git a/include/linux/thermal.h b/include/linux/thermal.h
> index a386a1c..f1aa3c2 100644
> --- a/include/linux/thermal.h
> +++ b/include/linux/thermal.h
> @@ -172,6 +172,8 @@ struct thermal_zone_device {
> int emul_temperature;
> int passive;
> unsigned int forced_passive;
> + bool overheated;
> + bool boost_polling;
> const struct thermal_zone_device_ops *ops;
> const struct thermal_zone_params *tzp;
> struct thermal_governor *governor;
> --
> 1.7.10.4
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-pm" in
> the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists