[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51D6E646.6020703@hp.com>
Date: Fri, 05 Jul 2013 11:29:10 -0400
From: Waiman Long <waiman.long@...com>
To: Al Viro <viro@...IV.linux.org.uk>
CC: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>,
Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@...e.cz>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>,
Andi Kleen <andi@...stfloor.org>,
"Chandramouleeswaran, Aswin" <aswin@...com>,
"Norton, Scott J" <scott.norton@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/12] Lockless update of reference count protected
by spinlock
On 07/05/2013 11:02 AM, Al Viro wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 05, 2013 at 10:47:33AM -0400, Waiman Long wrote:
>> v4->v5:
>> - Add a d_count() helper for readonly access of reference count and
>> change all references to d_count outside of dcache.c, dcache.h
>> and namei.c to use d_count().
> Sigh... You are breaking bisectability again. This helper should
> be introduced *first*, along with conversion to it. Then you can
> do the rest on top of that.
>
> I've just pushed such commit into vfs.git#for-linus; please, do the rest
> on top of it. And keep it bisectable, i.e. so that at any intermediate
> point the tree would build and work.
I am sorry. I didn't change anything in the dentry structure in patch 3.
So putting patches 4-11 on top of it won't break the build.
Regards,
Longman
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists