linux-kernel - [PATCH RFT] irqchip: sun4i: Remove wrong irq

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1373121329.13289.2.camel@phoenix>
Date:	Sat, 06 Jul 2013 22:35:29 +0800
From:	Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
To:	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Cc:	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RFT] irqchip: sun4i: Remove wrong irq_ack callback
 implementation

According to the datasheet[1], the Interrupt IRQ Pending Registers are
read-only. The implementation of sun4i_irq_ack() looks wrong because it writes
to these read-only registers.

This patch removes the wrong irq_ack callback implementation and all the code
writing to these read-only registers in sun4i_of_init().

[1] http://dl.linux-sunxi.org/A10/A10%20User%20Manual%20-%20v1.20%20%282012-04-09%2c%20DECRYPTED%29.pdf

Signed-off-by: Axel Lin <axel.lin@...ics.com>
---
Hi Maxime,
  I don't have this hardware, I'd appreciate if you can test this patch.
  If this patch works, I think we can just drop the patch I sent yesterday.
  ( It's "irqchip: sun4i: Staticize sun4i_irq_ack()"
    https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/5/43 )

Thanks,
Axel

 drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c | 18 ------------------
 1 file changed, 18 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
index b66d4ae..29b75c0a 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-sun4i.c
@@ -38,18 +38,6 @@ static struct irq_domain *sun4i_irq_domain;
 
 static asmlinkage void __exception_irq_entry sun4i_handle_irq(struct pt_regs *regs);
 
-void sun4i_irq_ack(struct irq_data *irqd)
-{
-	unsigned int irq = irqd_to_hwirq(irqd);
-	unsigned int irq_off = irq % 32;
-	int reg = irq / 32;
-	u32 val;
-
-	val = readl(sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(reg));
-	writel(val | (1 << irq_off),
-	       sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(reg));
-}
-
 static void sun4i_irq_mask(struct irq_data *irqd)
 {
 	unsigned int irq = irqd_to_hwirq(irqd);
@@ -76,7 +64,6 @@ static void sun4i_irq_unmask(struct irq_data *irqd)
 
 static struct irq_chip sun4i_irq_chip = {
 	.name		= "sun4i_irq",
-	.irq_ack	= sun4i_irq_ack,
 	.irq_mask	= sun4i_irq_mask,
 	.irq_unmask	= sun4i_irq_unmask,
 };
@@ -114,11 +101,6 @@ static int __init sun4i_of_init(struct device_node *node,
 	writel(0, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_MASK_REG(1));
 	writel(0, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_MASK_REG(2));
 
-	/* Clear all the pending interrupts */
-	writel(0xffffffff, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(0));
-	writel(0xffffffff, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(1));
-	writel(0xffffffff, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PENDING_REG(2));
-
 	/* Enable protection mode */
 	writel(0x01, sun4i_irq_base + SUN4I_IRQ_PROTECTION_REG);
 
-- 
1.8.1.2



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/