[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51DA1D75.2010503@atmel.com>
Date: Mon, 8 Jul 2013 10:01:25 +0800
From: Bo Shen <voice.shen@...el.com>
To: Richard Genoud <richard.genoud@...il.com>
CC: <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 08/13] sound: sam9x5_wm8731: machine driver for at91sam9x5
wm8731 boards
Hi Richard,
On 7/5/2013 23:15, Richard Genoud wrote:
>>> + card->dev = &pdev->dev;
>>> >>+ card->owner = THIS_MODULE;
>>> >>+ card->dai_link = dai;
>>> >>+ card->num_links = 1;
>>> >>+ dai->name = "WM8731";
>>> >>+ dai->stream_name = "WM8731 PCM";
>>> >>+ dai->codec_dai_name = "wm8731-hifi";
>>> >>+ dai->init = at91sam9x5ek_wm8731_init;
>>> >>+ card->dapm_widgets = at91sam9x5ek_dapm_widgets;
>>> >>+ card->num_dapm_widgets = ARRAY_SIZE(at91sam9x5ek_dapm_widgets);
>> >
>> >
>> >Will keep these as snd_soc_card and snd_soc_dai_link structure separately?
> I don't really understand what you mean here.
> do you mean that something like that will more explicit ? :
> + card->dai_link[0].name = "WM8731";
> + card->dai_link[0].stream_name = "WM8731 PCM";
> + card->dai_link[0].codec_dai_name = "wm8731-hifi";
> + card->dai_link[0].init = at91sam9x5ek_wm8731_init;
>
I mean using structure to define snd_soc_card and snd_soc_dai_link, look
like:
struct snd_soc_dai_link dai_link_name = {
.name = xxx,
.stream_name = xxx,
...
};
struct snd_soc_card card_name = {
.name = xxxx
.ower = THIS_MODULE,
.dai_link = &dai_link_name,
...
};
In this way, I think it will be more clear than put them in code.
Best Regards,
Bo Shen
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists