lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 19:09:35 -0700 From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org> To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com> Cc: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au, andi@...stfloor.org, oleg@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com, axboe@...nel.dk, target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lib/idr.c rewrite, percpu ida/tag allocator On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 14:48 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote: > On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 03:59:06PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote: > > On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 22:08 -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote: > > > Previous posting: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1511216 > > > > > > The only real change since the last version is that I've reworked the > > > new ida implementation to not use one giant allocation - it's still > > > logically one big arary, but it's implemented as an array of arrays. > > > > > > With that, it scales up to INT_MAX allocated ids just fine. Benchmarks > > > are included in that patch. > > > > > > Patch series is available in my git repo: > > > git://evilpiepirate.org/~kent/linux-bcache.git idr > > > > > > Andrew, want to pick this up for 3.12? > > > > Just FYI that the target-pending/target-per-cpu-ida branch utilizing > > per-cpu ida logic for vhost-scsi has been rebased to include this latest > > series. Thanks Kent! > > > > Andrew, what are your plans for this..? > > > > Would you consider allowing this series be merged through target-pending > > in order to allow us to start taking advantage of per-cpu ida tag > > pre-allocation optimizations for v3.12 target code..? > > > > Another option would be to merge the per-cpu ida specific piece now for > > v3.11 for which the risk is low given it doesn't touch any existing > > code, and then include Kent's full idr rewrite separately as v3.12 item. > > > > WDYT..? > > Takes as is, this conflicts with cleanup patches by Asias in vhost-next > that I was going to send to Linus for 3.11. So the proposed vhost-scsi per-cpu ida/tag pre-allocation changes should be considered v3.12 items. > Merging new target code for 3.11 and vhost code for 3.12 > helps keep the dependencies simple, so I'm all for it. > My point above is that having (at least) Kent's per-cpu ida code merged for v3.11 would make it easier to move forward during the v3.12 cycle on per-cpu ida/tag conversions for vhost-scsi + other target fabric drivers. --nab -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists