[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1373249375.7397.139.camel@haakon3.risingtidesystems.com>
Date: Sun, 07 Jul 2013 19:09:35 -0700
From: "Nicholas A. Bellinger" <nab@...ux-iscsi.org>
To: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@...hat.com>
Cc: Kent Overstreet <kmo@...erainc.com>, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, tj@...nel.org, sfr@...b.auug.org.au,
andi@...stfloor.org, oleg@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com,
axboe@...nel.dk, target-devel <target-devel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] lib/idr.c rewrite, percpu ida/tag allocator
On Sun, 2013-07-07 at 14:48 +0300, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 06, 2013 at 03:59:06PM -0700, Nicholas A. Bellinger wrote:
> > On Fri, 2013-07-05 at 22:08 -0700, Kent Overstreet wrote:
> > > Previous posting: http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1511216
> > >
> > > The only real change since the last version is that I've reworked the
> > > new ida implementation to not use one giant allocation - it's still
> > > logically one big arary, but it's implemented as an array of arrays.
> > >
> > > With that, it scales up to INT_MAX allocated ids just fine. Benchmarks
> > > are included in that patch.
> > >
> > > Patch series is available in my git repo:
> > > git://evilpiepirate.org/~kent/linux-bcache.git idr
> > >
> > > Andrew, want to pick this up for 3.12?
> >
> > Just FYI that the target-pending/target-per-cpu-ida branch utilizing
> > per-cpu ida logic for vhost-scsi has been rebased to include this latest
> > series. Thanks Kent!
> >
> > Andrew, what are your plans for this..?
> >
> > Would you consider allowing this series be merged through target-pending
> > in order to allow us to start taking advantage of per-cpu ida tag
> > pre-allocation optimizations for v3.12 target code..?
> >
> > Another option would be to merge the per-cpu ida specific piece now for
> > v3.11 for which the risk is low given it doesn't touch any existing
> > code, and then include Kent's full idr rewrite separately as v3.12 item.
> >
> > WDYT..?
>
> Takes as is, this conflicts with cleanup patches by Asias in vhost-next
> that I was going to send to Linus for 3.11.
So the proposed vhost-scsi per-cpu ida/tag pre-allocation changes should
be considered v3.12 items.
> Merging new target code for 3.11 and vhost code for 3.12
> helps keep the dependencies simple, so I'm all for it.
>
My point above is that having (at least) Kent's per-cpu ida code merged
for v3.11 would make it easier to move forward during the v3.12 cycle on
per-cpu ida/tag conversions for vhost-scsi + other target fabric
drivers.
--nab
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists