[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51DC3078.5090602@monstr.eu>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 17:47:04 +0200
From: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
To: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
device-drivers-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: convert drivers to use bits_per_word_mask
> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c
> index e1d7696..f321bf9 100644
> --- a/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c
> +++ b/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c
> @@ -232,21 +232,6 @@ static int xilinx_spi_setup_transfer(struct spi_device *spi,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static int xilinx_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
> -{
> - /* always return 0, we can not check the number of bits.
> - * There are cases when SPI setup is called before any driver is
> - * there, in that case the SPI core defaults to 8 bits, which we
> - * do not support in some cases. But if we return an error, the
> - * SPI device would not be registered and no driver can get hold of it
> - * When the driver is there, it will call SPI setup again with the
> - * correct number of bits per transfer.
> - * If a driver setups with the wrong bit number, it will fail when
> - * it tries to do a transfer
> - */
> - return 0;
> -}
> -
> static void xilinx_spi_fill_tx_fifo(struct xilinx_spi *xspi)
> {
> u8 sr;
> @@ -377,7 +362,6 @@ struct spi_master *xilinx_spi_init(struct device *dev, struct resource *mem,
> xspi->bitbang.chipselect = xilinx_spi_chipselect;
> xspi->bitbang.setup_transfer = xilinx_spi_setup_transfer;
> xspi->bitbang.txrx_bufs = xilinx_spi_txrx_bufs;
> - xspi->bitbang.master->setup = xilinx_spi_setup;
> init_completion(&xspi->done);
>
> if (!request_mem_region(mem->start, resource_size(mem),
>
This part of this patch is breaking xilinx spi driver because when
spi_bitbang_start is called it goes through some if else...
and because bitbang->txrx_bufs is defined
it end up in this code
} else if (!master->setup) {
return -EINVAL;
}
Probably the best solution is just revert this part of patch.
Mark: What do you think?
Thanks,
Michal
--
Michal Simek, Ing. (M.Eng), OpenPGP -> KeyID: FE3D1F91
w: www.monstr.eu p: +42-0-721842854
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Microblaze cpu - http://www.monstr.eu/fdt/
Maintainer of Linux kernel - Xilinx Zynq ARM architecture
Microblaze U-BOOT custodian and responsible for u-boot arm zynq platform
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (264 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists