[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51DC3155.7020709@wwwdotorg.org>
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2013 09:50:45 -0600
From: Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
To: monstr@...str.eu
CC: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>,
Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
spi-devel-general@...ts.sourceforge.net,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
device-drivers-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org,
Mike Frysinger <vapier@...too.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] spi: convert drivers to use bits_per_word_mask
On 07/09/2013 09:47 AM, Michal Simek wrote:
>> diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c b/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c
>> index e1d7696..f321bf9 100644 --- a/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c +++
>> b/drivers/spi/spi-xilinx.c @@ -232,21 +232,6 @@ static int
>> xilinx_spi_setup_transfer(struct spi_device *spi, return 0; }
>>
>> -static int xilinx_spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi) -{ - /*
>> always return 0, we can not check the number of bits. - * There
>> are cases when SPI setup is called before any driver is - *
>> there, in that case the SPI core defaults to 8 bits, which we -
>> * do not support in some cases. But if we return an error, the -
>> * SPI device would not be registered and no driver can get hold
>> of it - * When the driver is there, it will call SPI setup again
>> with the - * correct number of bits per transfer. - * If a
>> driver setups with the wrong bit number, it will fail when - *
>> it tries to do a transfer - */ - return 0; -} - static void
>> xilinx_spi_fill_tx_fifo(struct xilinx_spi *xspi) { u8 sr; @@
>> -377,7 +362,6 @@ struct spi_master *xilinx_spi_init(struct device
>> *dev, struct resource *mem, xspi->bitbang.chipselect =
>> xilinx_spi_chipselect; xspi->bitbang.setup_transfer =
>> xilinx_spi_setup_transfer; xspi->bitbang.txrx_bufs =
>> xilinx_spi_txrx_bufs; - xspi->bitbang.master->setup =
>> xilinx_spi_setup; init_completion(&xspi->done);
>>
>> if (!request_mem_region(mem->start, resource_size(mem),
>>
>
> This part of this patch is breaking xilinx spi driver because when
> spi_bitbang_start is called it goes through some if else... and
> because bitbang->txrx_bufs is defined it end up in this code } else
> if (!master->setup) { return -EINVAL; }
>
> Probably the best solution is just revert this part of patch. Mark:
> What do you think?
Hmm. Why is master->setup required by the bitbang driver, if it's
legal (i.e. the code works) to implement it just by doing nothing?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists