linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] mmc: dw_mmc: Add exynos resume callback to clear WAKEUP

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CANEJEGt4r==VD1gUrTGr=uooFQ-_Odayr3Yv=6i3dwDpf1Y+cg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 10 Jul 2013 17:43:58 -0700
From:	Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>
To:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Jaehoon Chung <jh80.chung@...sung.com>,
	Seungwon Jeon <tgih.jun@...sung.com>,
	James Hogan <james.hogan@...tec.com>,
	Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>,
	Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@...sung.com>,
	Abhilash Kesavan <a.kesavan@...sung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	"linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mmc: dw_mmc: Add exynos resume callback to clear WAKEUP_INT

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 12:09 PM, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:31 AM, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
>> If the WAKEUP_INT is asserted at wakeup and not cleared, we'll end up
>> looping around forever.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/mmc/host/dw_mmc-exynos.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++++
>>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
>
> Grant just pointed out that the WAKEUP_INT is supposed to only be
> enabled if bits 8, 9, or 10 are 1.  Our driver never sets those so we
> _should_ never get a WAKEUP_INT.  Bits 8-10 are marked as RESERVED on
> the exynos5420 manual, so the current guess is that they're broken on
> that silicon but that sometimes the interrupt fires anyway.
>
> In any case, it is still a reasonable thing to clear this interrupt at
> wakeup if it has fired, even if we're on an exynos device without any
> problems.

I agree. Can add:
  Reviewed-by: Grant Grundler <grundler@...omium.org>

thanks,
grant

>
> -Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/