lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51DFCB8F.2080608@free-electrons.com>
Date:	Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:25:35 +0200
From:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
To:	Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>
CC:	Jonathan Cameron <jic23@....ac.uk>,
	Maxime Ripard <maxime.ripard@...e-electrons.com>,
	jimwall@...om, brian@...stalfontz.com,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>
Subject: Re: [RFC] iio: mxs-lradc: compute temperature from channel 8 and
 9

Hi,

On 01/07/2013 19:16, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> The mxs LRADC is able to read an internal die temperature sensor. The
> temperature has to be calculated from the value read on channel 8 and channel 9.
> To be able to expose the result to hwmon, implement iio channel 8 as
> (channel 9 - channel 8). Then, implement IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE and
> IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET so that it can be processed by hwmon through the in kernel
> provider/consumer mechanism.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...e-electrons.com>

I didn't get any review on that patch. I know it will already conflict
with what Hector has been working on but would that be the good way to go ?


> ---
>  drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c | 99 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 82 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> index 163c638..df1d81e 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/iio/adc/mxs-lradc.c
> @@ -225,26 +225,14 @@ struct mxs_lradc {
>  #define	LRADC_CTRL4_LRADCSELECT_MASK(n)		(0xf << ((n) * 4))
>  #define	LRADC_CTRL4_LRADCSELECT_OFFSET(n)	((n) * 4)
>  
> -/*
> - * Raw I/O operations
> - */
> -static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> -			const struct iio_chan_spec *chan,
> -			int *val, int *val2, long m)
> +static int mxs_lradc_read_single(struct iio_dev *iio_dev, int chan, int *val)
>  {
>  	struct mxs_lradc *lradc = iio_priv(iio_dev);
>  	int ret;
>  	unsigned long mask;
>  
> -	if (m != IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
> -	/* Check for invalid channel */
> -	if (chan->channel > LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS)
> -		return -EINVAL;
> -
>  	/* Validate the channel if it doesn't intersect with reserved chans. */
> -	bitmap_set(&mask, chan->channel, 1);
> +	bitmap_set(&mask, chan, 1);
>  	ret = iio_validate_scan_mask_onehot(iio_dev, &mask);
>  	if (ret)
>  		return -EINVAL;
> @@ -273,7 +261,7 @@ static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
>  	/* Clean the slot's previous content, then set new one. */
>  	writel(LRADC_CTRL4_LRADCSELECT_MASK(0),
>  		lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL4 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_CLR);
> -	writel(chan->channel, lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL4 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET);
> +	writel(chan, lradc->base + LRADC_CTRL4 + STMP_OFFSET_REG_SET);
>  
>  	writel(0, lradc->base + LRADC_CH(0));
>  
> @@ -302,6 +290,74 @@ err:
>  	return ret;
>  }
>  
> +static int mxs_lradc_read_temp(struct iio_dev *iio_dev, int *val)
> +{
> +	int ret, min, max;
> +
> +	ret = mxs_lradc_read_single(iio_dev, 8, &min);
> +	if (ret != IIO_VAL_INT)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	ret = mxs_lradc_read_single(iio_dev, 9, &max);
> +	if (ret != IIO_VAL_INT)
> +		return ret;
> +
> +	*val = max - min;
> +
> +	return IIO_VAL_INT;
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Raw I/O operations
> + */
> +static int mxs_lradc_read_raw(struct iio_dev *iio_dev,
> +			const struct iio_chan_spec *chan,
> +			int *val, int *val2, long m)
> +{
> +	/* Check for invalid channel */
> +	if (chan->channel > LRADC_MAX_TOTAL_CHANS)
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	switch (m) {
> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW:
> +		if (chan->type == IIO_TEMP)
> +			return mxs_lradc_read_temp(iio_dev, val);
> +
> +		return mxs_lradc_read_single(iio_dev, chan->channel, val);
> +
> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE:
> +		if (chan->type == IIO_TEMP) {
> +			/* From the datasheet, we have to multiply by 1.012 and
> +			 * divide by 4
> +			 */
> +			*val = 0;
> +			*val2 = 253000;
> +			return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> +		}
> +
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	case IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET:
> +		if (chan->type == IIO_TEMP) {
> +			/* The calculated value from the ADC is in Kelvin, we
> +			 * want Celsius for hwmon so the offset is
> +			 * -272.15 * scale
> +			 */
> +			*val = -1075;
> +			*val2 = 691699;
> +
> +			return IIO_VAL_INT_PLUS_MICRO;
> +		}
> +
> +		return -EINVAL;
> +
> +	default:
> +		break;
> +	}
> +
> +	return -EINVAL;
> +}
> +
>  static const struct iio_info mxs_lradc_iio_info = {
>  	.driver_module		= THIS_MODULE,
>  	.read_raw		= mxs_lradc_read_raw,
> @@ -836,8 +892,17 @@ static const struct iio_chan_spec mxs_lradc_chan_spec[] = {
>  	MXS_ADC_CHAN(5, IIO_VOLTAGE),
>  	MXS_ADC_CHAN(6, IIO_VOLTAGE),
>  	MXS_ADC_CHAN(7, IIO_VOLTAGE),	/* VBATT */
> -	MXS_ADC_CHAN(8, IIO_TEMP),	/* Temp sense 0 */
> -	MXS_ADC_CHAN(9, IIO_TEMP),	/* Temp sense 1 */
> +	/* Combined Temperature sensors */
> +	{
> +		.type = IIO_TEMP,
> +		.indexed = 1,
> +		.scan_index = 8,
> +		.info_mask_separate = BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_RAW) |
> +				      BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_OFFSET) |
> +				      BIT(IIO_CHAN_INFO_SCALE),
> +		.channel = 8,
> +		.scan_type = {.sign = 'u', .realbits = 18, .storagebits = 32,},
> +	},
>  	MXS_ADC_CHAN(10, IIO_VOLTAGE),	/* VDDIO */
>  	MXS_ADC_CHAN(11, IIO_VOLTAGE),	/* VTH */
>  	MXS_ADC_CHAN(12, IIO_VOLTAGE),	/* VDDA */


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux, Kernel and Android engineering
http://free-electrons.com

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ