linux-kernel - Re: BUG: key ffff880c1148c478 not in .data! (V3.10.0)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130712131340.1a371662.mchehab@infradead.org>
Date:	Fri, 12 Jul 2013 13:13:40 -0300
From:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
To:	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
Cc:	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>, Linda Walsh <lkml@...nx.org>,
	Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
	linux-edac@...r.kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
Subject: Re: BUG: key ffff880c1148c478 not in .data! (V3.10.0)

Em Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:21:06 +0200
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> escreveu:

> On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 10:57:41AM -0300, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > This will be overriding the content of the static var mc_bus every for
> > every new memory controller. Are you sure that bus.name is only used
> > on register, or if its contents is stored somewhere?
> 
> bus_register does kobject_set_name which copies bus->name, for example,

Ok, so, it could be safe.

> but I didn't look exhaustively.

Did you try to remove and reinsert the edac driver a few times, on a
multi-memory controller machine? The bus nodes got created properly?
> 
> Just to be on the safe side, I should probably do a
> 
> static const char **bus_names = { "mc0", "mc1", ..., "mc7" };

You would likely to use an array for the bus_type too, if reusing
the static one is an issue.

> and use it. Are 8 enough for your edac drivers too?

With edac_ghes, I suspect that the worse case, on Intel side, is the
Nehalem/Sandy Bridge/Ivy Bridge EX machines.

Tony,

What would be a reasonable maximum limit for the number of memory
controllers, on a -EX machine?

Cheers,
Mauro
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/