linux-kernel - RE: BUG: key ffff880c1148c478 not in .data! (V3.10.0)

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F31C7D83C@ORSMSX106.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date:	Fri, 12 Jul 2013 16:19:24 +0000
From:	"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
	Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
CC:	Markus Trippelsdorf <markus@...ppelsdorf.de>,
	Ming Lei <tom.leiming@...il.com>, Linda Walsh <lkml@...nx.org>,
	Linux-Kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Doug Thompson <dougthompson@...ssion.com>,
	"linux-edac@...r.kernel.org" <linux-edac@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: RE: BUG: key ffff880c1148c478 not in .data! (V3.10.0)

> What would be a reasonable maximum limit for the number of memory
> controllers, on a -EX machine?

Westmere-EX has one memory controller per socket ... and there are glueless systems up to 8 sockets.  So 8 there. Not sure if any OEM is building larger machines with a node controller (SGI? Not sure if they build their behemoths from -EP or -EX parts).

Ivy Bridge ups the ante with two memory controllers on a socket. So plan on doubling soon.

-Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/