[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130712173101.GA9677@dhcp-172-17-186-34.nvidia.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Jul 2013 10:31:02 -0700
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@...com>
Cc: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>,
'Bjorn Helgaas' <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
linux-pci@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
'Kukjin Kim' <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Pratyush Anand <pratyush.anand@...com>,
Mohit KUMAR <Mohit.KUMAR@...com>,
'Arnd Bergmann' <arnd@...db.de>,
'Sean Cross' <xobs@...agi.com>,
'SRIKANTH TUMKUR SHIVANAND' <ts.srikanth@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] pci: exynos: split into two parts such as Synopsys
part and Exynos part
On Fri, Jul 12, 2013 at 03:31:23PM +0530, Kishon Vijay Abraham I wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Thursday 11 July 2013 11:19 AM, Jingoo Han wrote:
[...]
> > /* set the number of lines as 4 */
> > - readl_rc(pp, dbi_base + PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL, &val);
> > + dw_pcie_readl_rc(pp, dbi_base + PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL, &val);
> > val &= ~PORT_LINK_MODE_MASK;
> > val |= PORT_LINK_MODE_4_LANES;
> > - writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL);
> > + dw_pcie_writel_rc(pp, val, dbi_base + PCIE_PORT_LINK_CONTROL);
>
> I guess here we need to make this configurable. In Jacinto6 this can be either
> single lane or double lane. Maybe we should have a dt property to specify the
> number of lanes?
On Tegra we use nvidia,num-lanes to specify the lane count for each
port. Perhaps standardizing on a generic num-lanes property would make
sense? Cc'ing devicetree-discuss mailing list, maybe somebody can
provide some guidance.
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists