| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <51E3C3E0.1050906@mev.co.uk> Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 10:41:52 +0100 From: Ian Abbott <abbotti@....co.uk> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> CC: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Ian Abbott <ian.abbott@....co.uk>, "oliver@...inagl.nl" <oliver@...inagl.nl>, "linux@...ck-us.net" <linux@...ck-us.net> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 01/10] Driver core and sysfs changes for attribute groups On 2013-07-15 00:05, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: > Ian, I didn't add a DEVICE_PATTR() macro yet, that can come later. I > considered it, but that would also mean a BUS_PATTR() and the like, which I > guess works, but I hate even a _hint_ of "Hungarian" notation, which this > implies. > > Anyone else have a better name for this macro: > #define DEVICE_PATTR(_name) &dev_attr_##_name.attr > that they can think of? It will cut down on the typing done for > attribute lists. DEVICE_ATTR_P or DEV_ATTR_P to save typing. Or would that be confused with the P convention[1]? If so, DEVICE_ATTR_PTR or DEV_ATTR_PTR could be used. [1] see Jargon File. -- -=( Ian Abbott @ MEV Ltd. E-mail: <abbotti@....co.uk> )=- -=( Tel: +44 (0)161 477 1898 FAX: +44 (0)161 718 3587 )=- -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists