[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <009b01ce814d$def7a6c0$9ce6f440$@samsung.com>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 20:24:29 +0900
From: Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@...sung.com>
To: 'Grant Grundler' <grundler@...omium.org>
Cc: 'Linux ARM Kernel' <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
'Linux IOMMU' <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
'Linux Kernel' <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
'Linux Samsung SOC' <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
'Hyunwoong Kim' <khw0178.kim@...sung.com>,
'Joerg Roedel' <joro@...tes.org>,
'Kukjin Kim' <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
'Prathyush' <prathyush.k@...sung.com>,
'Rahul Sharma' <rahul.sharma@...sung.com>,
'Subash Patel' <supash.ramaswamy@...aro.org>,
'Keyyoung Park' <keyyoung.park@...sung.com>,
'Doug Anderson' <dianders@...omium.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 00/12] iommu/exynos: Fixes and Enhancements of System
MMU driver with DT
> From: grundler@...gle.com [mailto:grundler@...gle.com] On Behalf Of Grant Grundler
> Sent: Friday, July 12, 2013 2:23 AM
>
> On Fri, Jul 5, 2013 at 5:29 AM, Cho KyongHo <pullip.cho@...sung.com> wrote:
> > The current exynos-iommu(System MMU) driver does not work autonomously
> > since it is lack of support for power management of peripheral blocks.
> ...
> > Patch summary:
> > [PATCH v7 1/9] iommu/exynos: do not include removed header
> > [PATCH v7 2/9] iommu/exynos: add missing cache flush for removed page table entries
> > [PATCH v7 3/9] iommu/exynos: fix page table maintenance
> > [PATCH v7 4/9] iommu/exynos: allocate lv2 page table from own slab
> > [PATCH v7 5/9] iommu/exynos: change rwlock to spinlock
> > [PATCH v7 6/9] clk: exynos5250: add gate clock descriptions of System MMU
> > [PATCH v7 7/9] ARM: dts: Add description of System MMU of Exynos SoCs
> > [PATCH v7 8/9] iommu/exynos: support for device tree
> > [PATCH v7 9/9] iommu/exynos: add bus notifier for registering System MMU
>
> Cho,
> Of the above patches, nearly all have been applied to chromeos-3.8
> (kernel-next git tree) by Doug Anderson and others.
>
> AFAICT, the only ones not applied are:
> [v7,3/9] iommu/exynos: fix page table maintenance
> [v7,6/9] clk: exynos5250: add gate clock descriptions of System MMU
> (conflicts in this one)
> [v7,7/9] ARM: dts: Add description of System MMU of Exynos SoCs
> (depends on 6/9)
>
> We also already have parts of:
> [v7,9/9] iommu/exynos: add bus notifier for registering System MMU
>
> Some of those are being further discussed but I've lost track now
> exactly which ones.
>
> I'm telling you about chromeos-3.8 status since the adopted changes
> have been reviewed (by me and others) are being tested manually here
> on several different Samsung Exynos platforms (including 5250 which is
> our "snow" platform). Not sure how you should to mark those patches
> since they aren't identical to your changes (which apply to post 3.10
> kernels, not 3.8). You might consider splitting those patches out
> from the 4 I've listed above to get that series accepted upstream
> since the additional review/testing should provide some confidence
> those patches are good.
>
I understand what you are concerning about.
Have you applied v6 patchset?
I will try to split the patches and make the changes from v6
on top of the v6 patcheset.
> cheers,
> grant
Thank you.
Cho KyonogHo.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists