linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: remove references to non-DT SoCs

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 15 Jul 2013 12:25:03 +0100
From:	Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc:	Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Sangbeom Kim <sbkim73@...sung.com>,
	Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
	Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.de>,
	linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: EXYNOS: remove references to non-DT SoCs

On Sun, Jul 14, 2013 at 03:18:16PM +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
> On Sun, 2013-07-14 at 13:45 +0100, Mark Brown wrote:

> > Simply removing the dependencies is not going to give the clearly
> > intended effect here.  The dependency on the DT only machine needs to be
> > replaced with something, not just deleted, otherwise the driver can't be
> > enabled in Kconfig.

> I interpreted commit 383ffda2fa as a commit that just removed a lot of

Always provide human readable descriptions of commits in email.

> stuff: see its commit explanation and its diffstat (it adds one line and
> deletes over 900 lines). Moreover, after that commit the references to
> MACH_SMDKV310 and MACH_SMDKC210 both are nops. Deleting them can't
> possibly change anything.

This still doesn't have much to do with your commit message or indicate
much understanding of what the change is actually doing or why it might
be a problem.

> But, anyhow, what would be the symbols to use here?

Well, let's think about this for a minute - what is going on when
someone does a device tree conversion on a platform?  What is replacing
the board files?  What would an equivalent change be for the audio
driver?

> Besides, this patch was intended as a follow up to commit 383ffda2fa, to
> clean up two references it apparently forgot to remove, and therefor
> basically copied the subject line used in that commit.

That doesn't really help - putting in a completely irrelevant subject
line is a really good way to get your patch ignored.

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (837 bytes)