lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdWR12v9vHYZM1RJC3zJA0JCdr5K8VY3Gn2+HaR+5iNfzw@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 15 Jul 2013 19:28:18 +0200
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Steven Miao <realmz6@...nel.org>
Cc:	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>,
	"uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org" 
	<uclinux-dist-devel@...ckfin.uclinux.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [uclinux-dist-devel] [GIT PULL] Blackfin updates for 3.11

Hi Steven,

On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 11:15 AM, Steven Miao <realmz6@...nel.org> wrote:
> Steven Miao (2):
>       smp: refine bf561 smpboot code

Unfortunately this landed too late in -next to notice:

arch/blackfin/mach-common/smp.c:150:2: error: conversion to non-scalar
type requested
arch/blackfin/mach-common/smp.c:185:23: error: incompatible types when
assigning to type 'atomic_t' from type 'int'
arch/blackfin/mach-common/smp.c:186:24: error: incompatible types when
assigning to type 'atomic_t' from type 'int'
make[2]: *** [arch/blackfin/mach-common/smp.o] Error 1

http://kisskb.ellerman.id.au/kisskb/buildresult/9115952/

It's a bit embarrassing to break your own core code (with a patch that was
submitted for public review in August 2012?).

The last two can be trivially-fixed with the following
(whitespace-damaged gmail)
patch:

--- a/arch/blackfin/mach-common/smp.c
+++ b/arch/blackfin/mach-common/smp.c
@@ -182,8 +182,8 @@ static void bfin_ipi_init(void)
  struct ipi_data *bfin_ipi_data;
  for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) {
  bfin_ipi_data = &per_cpu(bfin_ipi, cpu);
- bfin_ipi_data->bits = 0;
- bfin_ipi_data->count = 0;
+ atomic_set(&bfin_ipi_data->bits, 0);
+ atomic_set(&bfin_ipi_data->count, 0);
  }
 }

but the first one is non-trivial: using xchg() on atomic_t is a bit gross...

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ