[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1374018370.6458.106.camel@gandalf.local.home>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2013 19:46:10 -0400
From: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
To: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: David Lang <david@...g.hm>,
ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>,
stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ATTEND] How to act on LKML (was: [
00/19] 3.10.1-stable review)
On Tue, 2013-07-16 at 19:38 -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> I'll admit that when I first started sending patches to LKML, I was
> terrified. Not because I was afraid of being scolded, but because I was
> afraid that what I sent wasn't good. It was a true judgment of my work.
> I was prettified. Sure, I wouldn't have liked being insulted, but as
OK, this has happened *again*! Really spell check? "pettrified" became
"prettified", and not "petrified"????
I just need to spell better :-p
Although, I have to admit, getting patches into the kernel has made me
prettier ;-)
-- Steve
> long as there was backing of why my work sucked I would be OK with it. I
> actually had a rather good response to my work and I hung around.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists