linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: Remove duplicate code in pinctrl_pm_select

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130717063144.GE7656@atomide.com>
Date:	Tue, 16 Jul 2013 23:31:44 -0700
From:	Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>
To:	Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com>
Cc:	linus.walleij@...aro.org, linux-omap@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/4] pinctrl: Remove duplicate code in
 pinctrl_pm_select_state functions

* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com> [130716 07:32]:
> Hi Tony,
> 
> On 07/16/2013 04:41 PM, Tony Lindgren wrote:
> >* Grygorii Strashko <grygorii.strashko@...com> [130716 06:22]:
> >>Hi Tony,
> >>
> >>This patch causes boot failure when I've applied my patch
> >>"[RFC] ARM: OMAP2+: omap_device: add pinctrl handling"
> >>https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/6/21/309
> >>
> >>on top of it:
> >
> >Hmm this patch alone removes duplicate code and if it causes
> >issues I must have made a typo somewhere.
> 
> No typo :) You've removed the check for !dev-pins.

Oh OK, sorry that was not intentional.

> And the failure place is:
> int pinctrl_pm_select_active_state(struct device *dev)
> {
>    return pinctrl_pm_select_state(dev, dev->pins->active_state);
>                                                 ^^^^ here
> }
> 
> If I understand everything right, the pinctrl support in Device core
> assumed to be optional - so, It's valid case, when there are no
> definition for device's pinctrl in DT at all.
> 
> And in this case dev->pins == NULL and  pinctrl_pm_select_*() API
> should return 0 always.

Care to post your patch as it sounds like you have it fixed
and tested?

Regards,

Tony
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/