[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <51E64BA8.30205@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:45:44 +0200
From: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
To: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: linux-media@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>,
Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>,
Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC v2 1/2] max77693: added device tree support
Hi Samuel,
A while ago I have send rebased patch adding device-tree support for
max77693 as you asked:
https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2414341/
The patch is still not applied. Is there a reason for that or just an
omission?
Regards
Andrzej
On 04/08/2013 05:21 PM, Samuel Ortiz wrote:
> Hi Andrzej,
>
> On Tue, Feb 19, 2013 at 04:36:16PM +0100, Andrzej Hajda wrote:
>> max77693 mfd main device uses only wakeup field
>> from max77693_platform_data. This field is mapped
>> to wakeup-source property in device tree.
>> Device tree bindings doc will be added in max77693-led patch.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@...sung.com>
>> Reviewed-by: Sylwester Nawrocki <s.nawrocki@...sung.com>
>> Signed-off-by: Kyungmin Park <kyungmin.park@...sung.com>
>> ---
>> drivers/mfd/max77693.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
>> 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
> This patch looks good to me, but doesn't apply to mfd-next. Would you mind
> rebasing it ?
>
> Cheers,
> Samuel.
>
>
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists