[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130717074810.GZ17211@twins.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 09:48:10 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jason Low <jason.low2@...com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
aswin@...com, scott.norton@...com, chegu_vinod@...com
Subject: Re: [RFC] sched: Limit idle_balance() when it is being used too
frequently
On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 09:25:04AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> One thing that I thought of since is that we need to consider what
> happens for people with a low resolution sched_clock. IIRC there are
> still platforms that are jiffy based.
Ignore that, they're all UP.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists