Message-ID: <51E660C6.1020409@oracle.com>
Date:	Wed, 17 Jul 2013 17:15:50 +0800
From:	Jeff Liu <jeff.liu@...cle.com>
To:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
CC:	Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>,
	David Lang <david@...g.hm>,
	ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
	Olivier Galibert <galibert@...ox.com>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [Ksummit-2013-discuss] [ATTEND] How to act on LKML

On 07/17/2013 08:51 AM, Steven Rostedt wrote:

> On Wed, 2013-07-17 at 08:32 +0800, Jeff Liu wrote:
> 
>> Another thing might deviated from the main theme, but I'd like to raise it
>> here because I would like to see what's the proper way for that.
>>
>> For instance, people A posted a patch set to the mailing list at first,
>> people B think that there are some issues in A's implementation, and he
>> happened to play around the same stuff recently, so he submitted another
>> patch series.  Finally, people B made it.
>> (In that period, people A kept silent, maybe because he/she was unhappy) 
>>
>> This is a actual occurrence I once observed from a subsystem list(my
>> apologies, I just want to talk this case rather than against somebody),
>> it seems people A is a new comer(because I can not searched any past
>> commits of him/her from the git log), people B is definitely a senior guy.
>>
>> So that's my question, is that a proper collaboration form in kernel
>> community?  Does it better if people B could give some suggestions to
>> help A to improve the code, especially if those help would help A stepping
>> into the kernel development -- maybe it's depend largely on one's opinion. :(
> 
> This is a completely different issue from the one in this thread, but it
> is also a legitimate issue and honestly, a bigger one than perceived
> insults.
> 
> Is it proper collaboration? Absolutely not. Something that I try to be
> sensitive to as it's something I can do as well. There's been things on
> my todo list, where someone would send me patches that do it. I would be
> thinking "darn it, I wanted to do it" and even worse, the patches that
> were sent wouldn't be of the way I wanted them. But I've tried to be
> good, and instead of just going about and implementing it myself, I
> would try to help the person massage the patches into what I wanted.

It's kind of you. Generally, most forks are nice enough in helping others.
Actually, I only noticed once of something like that the year before.
Well, I just received an offline email from my college a fews hours ago as
she checked this topic and unfortunately, she has experienced the same thing
a few days ago.

> That takes a lot of effort and discipline, and honestly, helping someone
> else do the work you wanted is much harder than just doing it yourself. 

Exactly, so I always appreciate the patch reviewers.

Thanks,
-Jeff

> 
> Sometimes the maintainer just takes the easier route, and does the work
> themselves (because it's also more fun too). But that's really a slap in
> the face of the person that submitted the work in the first place. If
> anything hurts the community, it's this behavior. Not Linus giving
> someone an ass wipe.
> 
> -- Steve
>  
> 


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists