[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1374059639-8631-1-git-send-email-nhorman@tuxdriver.com>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 07:13:59 -0400
From: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>,
Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>,
Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley@...rix.com>,
Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>,
Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>,
Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] iommu/vt-d: Expand interrupt remapping quirk to cover x58 chipset
Recently we added an early quirk to detect 5500/5520 chipsets with early
revisions that had problems with irq draining with interrupt remapping enabled:
commit 03bbcb2e7e292838bb0244f5a7816d194c911d62
Author: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Date: Tue Apr 16 16:38:32 2013 -0400
iommu/vt-d: add quirk for broken interrupt remapping on 55XX chipsets
It turns out this same problem is present in the intel X58 chipset as well. See
errata 69 here:
http://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/chipsets/x58-express-specification-update.html
This patch extends the pci early quirk so that the chip devices/revisions
specified in the above update are also covered in the same way:
Signed-off-by: Neil Horman <nhorman@...driver.com>
Reviewed-by: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
CC: Jan Beulich <jbeulich@...e.com>
CC: Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>
CC: Andrew Cooper <andrew.cooper3@...rix.com>
CC: Malcolm Crossley <malcolm.crossley@...rix.com>
CC: Prarit Bhargava <prarit@...hat.com>
CC: Don Zickus <dzickus@...hat.com>
CC: Don Dutile <ddutile@...hat.com>
CC: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
CC: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
CC: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
CC: x86@...nel.org
CC: stable@...r.kernel.org
---
Note, this a repost of this patch. Don and I talked about this offline again,
and neither of us have been able to gather any information from intel on the
subject. While I understand his point that we should try to get confirmation
about inclusive steppings that are affected by this errata, I feel like we
should commit this patch based on the documentation we do have, and we can
always ammend it later if Intel indicates other chips are affected.
---
arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c | 15 +++++++++++++--
1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
index 94ab6b9..743d583 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/early-quirks.c
@@ -196,15 +196,23 @@ static void __init ati_bugs_contd(int num, int slot, int func)
static void __init intel_remapping_check(int num, int slot, int func)
{
u8 revision;
+ u16 device;
+ device = read_pci_config_16(num, slot, func, PCI_DEVICE_ID);
revision = read_pci_config_byte(num, slot, func, PCI_REVISION_ID);
/*
- * Revision 0x13 of this chipset supports irq remapping
- * but has an erratum that breaks its behavior, flag it as such
+ * Revision 13 of all triggering devices id in this quirk have
+ * a problem draining interrupts when irq remapping is enabled,
+ * and should be flagged as broken. Additionally revisions 0x12
+ * and 0x22 of device id 0x3405 has this problem.
*/
if (revision == 0x13)
set_irq_remapping_broken();
+ else if ((device == 0x3405) &&
+ ((revision == 0x12) ||
+ (revision == 0x22)))
+ set_irq_remapping_broken();
}
@@ -239,8 +247,11 @@ static struct chipset early_qrk[] __initdata = {
PCI_CLASS_SERIAL_SMBUS, PCI_ANY_ID, 0, ati_bugs_contd },
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x3403, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST,
PCI_BASE_CLASS_BRIDGE, 0, intel_remapping_check },
+ { PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x3405, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST,
+ PCI_BASE_CLASS_BRIDGE, 0, intel_remapping_check },
{ PCI_VENDOR_ID_INTEL, 0x3406, PCI_CLASS_BRIDGE_HOST,
PCI_BASE_CLASS_BRIDGE, 0, intel_remapping_check },
+
{}
};
--
1.8.1.4
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists