linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure duetomoduledependency.

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:08:56 -0700
From:	Tim Chen <tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com>
To:	Tetsuo Handa <penguin-kernel@...ove.SAKURA.ne.jp>
Cc:	herbert@...dor.apana.org.au, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-crypto@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.11-rc1] crypto: Fix boot failure
 duetomoduledependency.

On Thu, 2013-07-18 at 05:50 +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
> Tim Chen wrote:
> > > Therefore, I think possible solutions are either
> > > 
> > >   (a) built-in the dependent modules
> > > 
> > >       # grep crc /lib/modules/3.11.0-rc1+/modules.dep
> > >       kernel/drivers/scsi/sd_mod.ko: kernel/lib/crc-t10dif.ko
> > >       kernel/lib/crc-t10dif.ko:
> > 
> > This approach will increase kernel size for those who are not using
> > t10dif so some people may object.  
> > BTW, The PCLMULQDQ version does not need to be build in.
> 
> sd_mod.ko must choose one from versions available as of loading sd_mod.ko.
> Although it is not needed to built-in the PCLMULQDQ version for fixing the boot
> failure, it is needed to built-in the PCLMULQDQ version for getting performance
> improvement when PCLMULQDQ is supported.

The code in crct10dif transform allocation:

crct10dif_tfm = crypto_alloc_shash("crct10dif", 0, 0)

will allocate a t10dif crypto transform with highest priority.  
So as long as the crct10dif.ko and crct10dif-pclmul.ko are loaded, 
the pclmulqdq t10dif will have a higher priority and get allocated 
and used.

Thanks.

Tim

> 
> > Your approach is quite complicated.  I think something simpler like the
> > following will work:
> 
> We cannot benefit from PCLMULQDQ. Is it acceptable for you?


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/