[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.03.1307171830170.14924@syhkavp.arg>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:34:11 -0400 (EDT)
From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
cc: Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Don't complain in gic_get_cpumask() if UP
system
On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 07/12/13 05:10, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > On 07/12, Javi Merino wrote:
> >> I agree, we should drop the check. It's annoying in uniprocessors and
> >> unlikely to be found in the real world unless your gic entry in the dt
> >> is wrong.
And that's a likely outcome in the real world.
> >>
> > Ok. How about this?
>
> Any comments?
What about this instead:
diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
index 19ceaa60e0..86d21bc6cb 100644
--- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
+++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static u8 gic_get_cpumask(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
break;
}
- if (!mask)
+ if (is_smp() && !mask)
pr_crit("GIC CPU mask not found - kernel will fail to boot.\n");
return mask;
Nicolas
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists