[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51E71C78.6080604@codeaurora.org>
Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 15:36:40 -0700
From: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
To: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>
CC: Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Don't complain in gic_get_cpumask() if
UP system
On 07/17/13 15:34, Nicolas Pitre wrote:
> On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
>> On 07/12/13 05:10, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> On 07/12, Javi Merino wrote:
>>>> I agree, we should drop the check. It's annoying in uniprocessors and
>>>> unlikely to be found in the real world unless your gic entry in the dt
>>>> is wrong.
> And that's a likely outcome in the real world.
>
>>> Ok. How about this?
>> Any comments?
> What about this instead:
Unfortunately arm64 doesn't have SMP_ON_UP. It sounds like you preferred
the first patch using num_possible_cpus()
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> index 19ceaa60e0..86d21bc6cb 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-gic.c
> @@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static u8 gic_get_cpumask(struct gic_chip_data *gic)
> break;
> }
>
> - if (!mask)
> + if (is_smp() && !mask)
> pr_crit("GIC CPU mask not found - kernel will fail to boot.\n");
>
> return mask;
>
>
> Nicolas
--
Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
hosted by The Linux Foundation
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists