| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.03.1307171849180.14924@syhkavp.arg> Date: Wed, 17 Jul 2013 18:53:51 -0400 (EDT) From: Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org> To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org> cc: Javi Merino <javi.merino@....com>, "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, Russell King <rmk+kernel@....linux.org.uk>, "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org> Subject: Re: [PATCH] irqchip: gic: Don't complain in gic_get_cpumask() if UP system On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote: > On 07/17/13 15:34, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Jul 2013, Stephen Boyd wrote: > > > >> On 07/12/13 05:10, Stephen Boyd wrote: > >>> On 07/12, Javi Merino wrote: > >>>> I agree, we should drop the check. It's annoying in uniprocessors and > >>>> unlikely to be found in the real world unless your gic entry in the dt > >>>> is wrong. > > And that's a likely outcome in the real world. > > > >>> Ok. How about this? > >> Any comments? > > What about this instead: > > Unfortunately arm64 doesn't have SMP_ON_UP. And why does that matter? > It sounds like you preferred the first patch using num_possible_cpus() Probably, yes. I didn't follow the early conversation though. Nicolas -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists