[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51E7DA79.4060505@hitachi.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 21:07:21 +0900
From: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
To: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
jovi.zhangwei@...wei.com, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V2] tracing/kprobe: Wait for disabling all running
kprobe handlers
(2013/07/16 3:20), Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 07/09, Masami Hiramatsu wrote:
>>
>> Wait for disabling all running kprobe handlers when a kprobe
>> event is disabled, since the caller, trace_remove_event_call()
>> supposes that a removing event is disabled completely by
>> disabling the event.
>> With this change, ftrace can ensure that there is no running
>> event handlers after disabling it.
>>
>> Changes in V2:
>> - Comment (in code) for clarify why we need to wait there.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Masami Hiramatsu <masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com>
>
> Agreed.
>
> We need this change in any case, whatever we do in trace/trace_events.c
> and in unregister_trace_probe().
Steven, I think this patch is still needed anyway even if we are
discussing file handling bugs, because this fixes another timing bug.
Thank you,
--
Masami HIRAMATSU
IT Management Research Dept. Linux Technology Center
Hitachi, Ltd., Yokohama Research Laboratory
E-mail: masami.hiramatsu.pt@...achi.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists