[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51E7D29D.3000008@overkiz.com>
Date: Thu, 18 Jul 2013 13:33:49 +0200
From: boris brezillon <b.brezillon@...rkiz.com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
CC: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>,
Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
Jean-Christophe Plagniol-Villard <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] ASoC: atmel-ssc: remove clk_disable_unprepare
call from critical section
On 18/07/2013 12:58, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 12:21:38PM +0200, boris brezillon wrote:
>
>> I can send you the whole series if you want (already sent to LKML
>> and LAKML).
>> But I'd like to understand who I should send patches from this series to.
> When you send me patch 5/5 with no other information on the rest of the
> series I've no idea if there's any dependencies on the other code or
> anything like that. The key thing here is to make sure the people
> getting the patch can understand the interdependencies somehow.
>
> If you're sending a bunch of unrelated changes with no dependencies
> you're better off sending them all separately rather than as a part of a
> series.
Noted, I will send each patch separately next time (if they are unrelated).
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists