linux-kernel - Re: [ATTEND] How to act on LKML

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130719120841.GH26716@gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Jul 2013 14:08:41 +0200
From:	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>
To:	Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com>
Cc:	Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>,
	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Chris Ball <cjb@...top.org>,
	Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	ksummit-2013-discuss@...ts.linuxfoundation.org,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: Re: [ATTEND] How to act on LKML

* Felipe Contreras <felipe.contreras@...il.com> wrote:

> [...]
> 
> Anyway, through the discussion it has been established that swearing is 
> rare, most of often directed to the code, and on exceptional occasions 
> directed to people, when they *deserve* it. And you seem to be implying 
> that women can't tolerate that, so a change needs to be made in order to 
> attract more women to the project. Is that correct?

While I don't talk for Sarah, the way you have put it is broadly correct 
(although your formulation is adversarial and leading): most communities 
dominated by women are hugely offputting to males and communities 
dominated by males are hugely offputting to women.

Open communities dominated by one gender (males in most cases) that want 
to essentially double their creative brain capacity by attracting the 
other gender are well advised to try to figure out a solution to that 
problem.

> Personally I don't believe that. Essentially every other open source 
> project out there, except the Linux kernel, has some kind code of 
> conduct, whether it's implicit or explicit, and yet they don't have many 
> developer women either. But fine, let's suppose what you say it's true.

Code of conduct is unfortunately not enough - there's many conscious and 
subconscious dimensions to a community that make it offputting to one 
gender or the other and once a community becomes a mono-culture by one 
gender (due to historic gender bias or due to sheer luck) it's (very) hard 
to change it.

> As Linus already pointed out, not everybody has to work with everybody.

That's not the point though, the point is to potentially roughly double 
the creative brain capacity of the Linux kernel project.

Even if you don't care about gender fairness, that kind of bona fide 
benefit to the project is worth a try or two I think ...

Thanks,

	Ingo
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/