| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Fri, 19 Jul 2013 08:16:28 -0400 From: Kurt H Maier <khm@....org> To: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org> Cc: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>, Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>, Darren Hart <dvhart@...ux.intel.com>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au> Subject: Re: mistakes in code vs. maintainer flow mistakes (was: [ 00/19] 3.10.1-stable review) On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 11:22:56AM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote: > > ... and now you want to 'shut down' the discussion. With all due respect, > you started it, you have put out various heavy accusations here and > elsewhere, so you might as well take responsibility for it and let the > discussion be brought to a conclusion, wherever that may take us, compared > to your initial view? > This wasn't about having a discussion, it was about "taking a stand," and since the reaction to the stand wasn't unanimously supportive, it's easier to take it inside the wire, out of public view, before backing down. khm -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists