lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFLxGvxbYo+6nHThM70UuohA7dM+myJsF5FXcg_eS4S7-8AzVQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Fri, 19 Jul 2013 22:36:33 +0200
From:	richard -rw- weinberger <richard.weinberger@...il.com>
To:	"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>
Cc:	Ramkumar Ramachandra <artagnon@...il.com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Subject: Re: [QUERY] lguest64

On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 8:46 PM, H. Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com> wrote:
> On 07/19/2013 10:42 AM, Ramkumar Ramachandra wrote:
>> H. Peter Anvin wrote:
>>> We want to reduce pvops and pvops users, not increase them...
>>
>> I see.  So the future is true virtualization which exposes the
>> underlying hardware, like KVM?  Why do bare-metal virtualizers like
>> Xen employ paravirtualization?  Also, where does UML stand?

UML is a nice thingy because it is Linux ported to itself, but it has
limitations.
Mostly it's speed (pagefaults and system calls are really slow) and it
supports only x86/x86_64.

I use UML on systems where KVM is not available.

--
Thanks,
//richard
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ