linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] hugepage: allow parallelization of the hugepage fault path

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1374269055.9305.19.camel@buesod1.americas.hpqcorp.net>
Date:	Fri, 19 Jul 2013 14:24:15 -0700
From:	Davidlohr Bueso <davidlohr.bueso@...com>
To:	David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
Cc:	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
	Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
	Michel Lespinasse <walken@...gle.com>,
	Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
	Konstantin Khlebnikov <khlebnikov@...nvz.org>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	"AneeshKumarK.V" <aneesh.kumar@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	KAMEZAWA Hiroyuki <kamezawa.hiroyu@...fujitsu.com>,
	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Eric B Munson <emunson@...bm.net>,
	Anton Blanchard <anton@...ba.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] hugepage: allow parallelization of the hugepage fault
 path

On Fri, 2013-07-19 at 17:14 +1000, David Gibson wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 18, 2013 at 05:42:35PM +0900, Joonsoo Kim wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 17, 2013 at 12:50:25PM -0700, Davidlohr Bueso wrote:
> > > From: David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
> > > 
> > > At present, the page fault path for hugepages is serialized by a
> > > single mutex. This is used to avoid spurious out-of-memory conditions
> > > when the hugepage pool is fully utilized (two processes or threads can
> > > race to instantiate the same mapping with the last hugepage from the
> > > pool, the race loser returning VM_FAULT_OOM).  This problem is
> > > specific to hugepages, because it is normal to want to use every
> > > single hugepage in the system - with normal pages we simply assume
> > > there will always be a few spare pages which can be used temporarily
> > > until the race is resolved.
> > > 
> > > Unfortunately this serialization also means that clearing of hugepages
> > > cannot be parallelized across multiple CPUs, which can lead to very
> > > long process startup times when using large numbers of hugepages.
> > > 
> > > This patch improves the situation by replacing the single mutex with a
> > > table of mutexes, selected based on a hash, which allows us to know
> > > which page in the file we're instantiating. For shared mappings, the
> > > hash key is selected based on the address space and file offset being faulted.
> > > Similarly, for private mappings, the mm and virtual address are used.
> > > 
> > 
> > Hello.
> > 
> > With this table mutex, we cannot protect region tracking structure.
> > See below comment.
> > 
> > /*
> >  * Region tracking -- allows tracking of reservations and instantiated pages
> >  *                    across the pages in a mapping.
> >  *
> >  * The region data structures are protected by a combination of the mmap_sem
> >  * and the hugetlb_instantion_mutex.  To access or modify a region the caller
> >  * must either hold the mmap_sem for write, or the mmap_sem for read and
> >  * the hugetlb_instantiation mutex:
> >  *
> >  *      down_write(&mm->mmap_sem);
> >  * or
> >  *      down_read(&mm->mmap_sem);
> >  *      mutex_lock(&hugetlb_instantiation_mutex);
> >  */
> 
> Ugh.  Who the hell added that.  I guess you'll need to split of
> another mutex for that purpose, afaict there should be no interaction
> with the actual, intended purpose of the instantiation mutex.

This was added in commit 84afd99b. One way to go would be to add a
spinlock to protect changes to the regions - however reading the
changelog, and based on David's previous explanation for the
instantiation mutex, I don't see why it was added. In fact several
places modify regions without holding the instantiation mutex, ie:
hugetlb_reserve_pages()

Am I missing something here?

Thanks,
Davidlohr




--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/