| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 16:34:41 +0000 From: Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com> To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org> Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, "torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, "akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, "stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>, "shuahkhan@...il.com" <shuahkhan@...il.com>, Shuah Khan <shuah.kh@...sung.com> Subject: Re: [ 00/38] 3.9.11-stable review On 07/19/2013 06:10 PM, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 07/19/2013 05:50 PM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 12:25:24PM -0700, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>> On Fri, Jul 19, 2013 at 04:45:25PM +0000, Shuah Khan wrote: >>>> On 07/19/2013 09:34 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote: >>>>> --------------- >>>>> Note, this is the LAST 3.9-stable kernel release that I will be doing. >>>>> Please move to the 3.10-stable branch as soon as possible. >>>>> --------------- >>>>> >>>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 3.9.11 release. >>>>> There are 38 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response >>>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please >>>>> let me know. >>>>> >>>>> Responses should be made by Sun Jul 21 05:20:01 UTC 2013. >>>>> Anything received after that time might be too late. >>>>> >>>>> The whole patch series can be found in one patch at: >>>>> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.9.11-rc1.gz >>>>> and the diffstat can be found below. >>>>> >>>>> thanks, >>>>> >>>>> greg k-h >>>>> >>>> >>>> Greg, >>>> >>>> Build failed with the following error: >>>> >>>> LD ipc/built-in.o >>>> CC [M] fs/cifs/inode.o >>>> fs/cifs/inode.c: In function ‘cifs_all_info_to_fattr’: >>>> fs/cifs/inode.c:560:4: error: implicit declaration of function >>>> ‘cifs_dbg’ [-Werror=implicit-function-declaration] >>>> cc1: some warnings being treated as errors >>>> make[2]: *** [fs/cifs/inode.o] Error 1 >>>> make[1]: *** [fs/cifs] Error 2 >>>> make: *** [fs] Error 2 >>>> make: *** Waiting for unfinished jobs.... >>>> CC security/selinux/hooks.o >>>> >>>> I have CONFIG_CIFS=m in my config and CONFIG_CIFS_DEBUG is disabled. >>>> cifs_dbg() is not defined. >>> >>> Ugh, I thought I fixed that one... I did it for the 3.4 and other >>> trees, I'll go see what I did wrong... >> >> Ok, I've now fixed this, I don't know how it got through my tests, when >> I tried it again, it failed. Before it wasn't, odd... >> >> Anyway, there is a new -rc2 kernel patch at: >> kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/v3.0/stable-review/patch-3.9.11-rc2.gz >> >> If you could test that out, I would appreciate it, to ensure I didn't do >> anything stupid with this one too. >> >> Ick, handling 4 kernels at once really takes its toll on me, this was >> not a good review cycle... >> >> thanks, >> >> greg k-h >> > > Greg, > > rc2 compiled on x86-64. I will run cross-compile tests and boot tests > later on today or tomorrow morning and report the results. > > -- Shuah > > Shuah Khan, Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research > America (Silicon Valley) shuah.kh@...sung.com | (970) 672-0658 > 3.9.11-rc2 boot tests passed on my test systems and cross-compile tests passed. No regressions in dmesgs. -- Shuah Shuah Khan, Linux Kernel Developer - Open Source Group Samsung Research America (Silicon Valley) shuah.kh@...sung.com | (970) 672-0658 -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists