[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51EA05C0.6050606@ti.com>
Date: Sat, 20 Jul 2013 09:06:32 +0530
From: George Cherian <george.cherian@...com>
To: Sergei Shtylyov <sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com>
CC: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
<linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>, <balbi@...com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
<linux-omap@...r.kernel.org>, <kishon@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] arm: dts: Add USB phy nodes for AM33XX
On 7/20/2013 12:03 AM, Sergei Shtylyov wrote:
> Hello.
>
> On 07/19/2013 06:20 PM, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
>>>> b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
>>>> index 8e1248f..e3890c4 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
>>>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/am33xx.dtsi
>>>> @@ -326,21 +326,59 @@
>>>> status = "disabled";
>>>> };
>>>>
>>>> - usb@...00000 {
>>>> - compatible = "ti,musb-am33xx";
>>>> - reg = <0x47400000 0x1000 /* usbss */
>>>> - 0x47401000 0x800 /* musb instance 0 */
>>>> - 0x47401800 0x800>; /* musb instance 1 */
>>>> - interrupts = <17 /* usbss */
>>>> - 18 /* musb instance 0 */
>>>> - 19>; /* musb instance 1 */
>>>> - multipoint = <1>;
>>>> - num-eps = <16>;
>>>> - ram-bits = <12>;
>>>> - port0-mode = <3>;
>>>> - port1-mode = <3>;
>>>> - power = <250>;
>>>> - ti,hwmods = "usb_otg_hs";
>>>> + phy1: am335x-usb0@...10620 {
>
>>> Shouldn't the PHYs be *under* the usb0/1 device nodes in the
>>> hierarchy?
>>> They're not on the same bus as the MUSB controllers for sure.
>
>> I redo the complete thing. I have now:
>
>> usb: usb@...00000 {
>> compatible = "ti,am33xx-usb";
>>
>> usb0_phy: phy@...01300 {
>> compatible = "ti,am335x-usb-phy";
>> }
>> usb0: usb@...01000 {
>> musb0: usb@...01400 {
>> compatible = "mg,musbmhdrc";
>> }
>> }
>> usb1_phy: phy@...02300 {
>> compatible = "ti,am335x-usb-phy";
>> }
>> usb1: usb@...02000 {
>> musb1: usb@...02400 {
>> compatible = "mg,musbmhdrc";
>> }
>> }
>> }
>
>> And you want usb0_phy to be child of usb0? In the TRM they are all in
>> the same block.
>
> Ah, the fact that PHYs didn't have the "reg" property got me
> muddled, I didn't pay attention to the address part of the node
> names... BTW, where is the "reg" prop? I see PHYs share the address
> space with "omap-control-usb@...10620" device -- what's the point with
> this?
In control module(CM) each USB has got 2 registers in which one is a
shared register( wakeup register)
So all the CM access are done using the control-usb driver
(phy-omap-control-usb.c). Same reason why phy's dont have a reg property.
>
>> Sebastian
>
> WBR, Sergei
>
--
-George
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists