linux-kernel - Re: 3.10.1 cpufreq suspend/resume regression still present in 3.10.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130722155456.GA7836@sacarino.pirispons.net>
Date:	Mon, 22 Jul 2013 17:54:56 +0200
From:	Kiko Piris <kernel@...ispons.net>
To:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
	srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com
Subject: Re: 3.10.1 cpufreq suspend/resume regression still present in 3.10.2

On 22/07/2013 at 17:34 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:

> Note that I already suggested to Kiko to try that patch (see
> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/14/35 ). I don't know whether Kiko tried
> it, as I never received a reply to my suggestion. So, for now, I can
> only say that that patch will probably fix the issue.

Hi,

Aww! :(

I saw your message and was going to apply it, but I didn’t fully
understand that thread and wasn’t sure exactly what patch I was supposed
to try and above what version should I apply it (my “kernel skills” are
very very limited).

Then I just went back to 3.10.0 and forgot about it (until I saw the
3.10.2 release announcement). Sorry about that!

If you want me to test any patch, I would be more than happy to do so; I
would be grafeful if you told me exactly what patch to apply and above
which kernel version.

Cheers!

-- 
Kiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/