[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51ED56FF.9030508@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2013 21:29:59 +0530
From: "Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Kiko Piris <kernel@...ispons.net>, Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: 3.10.1 cpufreq suspend/resume regression still present in 3.10.2
On 07/22/2013 09:24 PM, Kiko Piris wrote:
> On 22/07/2013 at 17:34 +0200, Paul Bolle wrote:
>
>> Note that I already suggested to Kiko to try that patch (see
>> https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/7/14/35 ). I don't know whether Kiko tried
>> it, as I never received a reply to my suggestion. So, for now, I can
>> only say that that patch will probably fix the issue.
>
> Hi,
>
> Aww! :(
>
> I saw your message and was going to apply it, but I didn’t fully
> understand that thread and wasn’t sure exactly what patch I was supposed
> to try and above what version should I apply it (my “kernel skills” are
> very very limited).
>
> Then I just went back to 3.10.0 and forgot about it (until I saw the
> 3.10.2 release announcement). Sorry about that!
>
> If you want me to test any patch, I would be more than happy to do so; I
> would be grafeful if you told me exactly what patch to apply and above
> which kernel version.
>
Try applying the two mainline commits that I mentioned in my previous
mail, on top of 3.10.2 and check if it fixes your problem.
Regards,
Srivatsa S. Bhat
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists