linux-kernel - Re: 3.10.1 cpufreq suspend/resume regression still present in 3.10.2

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130722205203.GA8075@sacarino.pirispons.net>
Date:	Mon, 22 Jul 2013 22:52:03 +0200
From:	Kiko Piris <kernel@...ispons.net>
To:	"Srivatsa S. Bhat" <srivatsa.bhat@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Paul Bolle <pebolle@...cali.nl>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	gregkh@...uxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: 3.10.1 cpufreq suspend/resume regression still present in 3.10.2

On 22/07/2013 at 21:29 +0530, Srivatsa S. Bhat wrote:

> Try applying the two mainline commits that I mentioned in my previous
> mail, on top of 3.10.2 and check if it fixes your problem.

It does fix it.

Running 3.10.2 with your two patches, suspended and resumed a couple of
times without a problem (previously it didn’t wake up 100% of the
times).

Thank you both for your help!

Regards.

-- 
Kiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/